Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion let Mac lovers have their cake and run Windows too. Parallels pleases with richer tools, while Fusion is first for heavy-duty use Ever since Apple made the move ...

Our Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion shootout took a deep dive into the two most successful commercial virtualization products for the Mac, but many of you had questions about VirtualBox, the free ...

Though Parallels and VMWare offer "up to" native speeds in Windows, there are many times when more-advanced features in modern operating system will cause major performance issues, so how do these ...

A head-to-head test of Parallels Desktop for Mac and VMware Fusion - the two leading competitors in the Mac Virtualization segment - crowns Parallels as the clear winner, but the testers found both ...

With a new round of upgrades to the top virtualization packages for OS X, it's not clear yet which will be crowned king. Topher, an avid Mac user for the past 15 years, has been a contributing author ...

Virtual machines are the best way to accommodate different application needs in a datacenter environment. Whether you need to run your apps on a specific platform, or just need to meet scaling ...

VMware announced Monday that it will price its upcoming Windows-on-Mac virtualization software at a price comparable to its rival, Parallels Desktop. VMware said that its Fusion software can be ...

A little more than a year ago, I reviewed VMware’s Fusion 1.0 and Parallels Desktop 3.0 to see how they stacked up. Since then, both products have undergone major revisions, so I thought I’d see how ...

A fresh review of Windows virtualization products for Mac OS X machines reports that Parallels was faster in accomplishing a wide number of common business and user tasks with Windows XP, as VMware ...